Croatian Antifascists (a.k.a. Communists) losing the plot on democracy

Croatia's President Ivo Josipovic

Croatian president Ivo Josipovic delivered a speech at the “Days of Antifascism in Opatija” 7 – 9 March.

Given his past political affiliations, one could say that there’s nothing unusual about his  attendance of the Days of Antifascism. He had been an active member of the League of Yugoslav Communists for years (1980 – 1990); later he aligned himself with the Social Democratic Party in Croatia (in government currently), which arose from the League of Communists. Antifascist is just an another name for Communist as far as the mindset and political orientation go.

But, he declared himself politically independent in the office of the president and his attendance of antifascist meetings and keynote speaking causes concern and places serious doubts as to his political independence, or neutrality.

His speech in Opatija sounds with alarm bells, clearly and loudly: Josipovic is telling the world that right-wing politics don’t practice democracy, or can’t be trusted to practice it. Furthermore, he steers in the direction that “radicalism” is attributable to right wing politics and not the left. He suggests that protests and demonstrations are not an expression of democratic processes but rather some evil force of right wing politics devoid of good intentions for the people. And to top it all off he imputes reprehension and aggressive tendencies against the European people who have voted right wing politicians into parliaments.

He preaches that democracy should include the rights of all, and yet he denies the peoples’ rights to vote in accordance with their beliefs, to be radical, to express their national feelings, their disenchantments, their demands for a different or better outcome in their lives. Last time I looked even radicalism is considered a right within democracy.

Is Josipovic losing his plot when it comes to recognizing the plethora of democratic existence and practice, I wonder? But then again, deep down, he may still be stuck in the extreme leftist radicalism of Communism where there was no democracy.

Josipovic said on Friday March 9: “In the modern European society there is no danger from left radicalism and extremism. The right radicalism is threatening European democracy, right-wingers win a serious number of places in parliaments. What to do so that history doesn’t repeat itself? The key word is democracy which will prevent aggressive political movements, but democracy is not enough, especially not as a technique.”

He stressed that fascism and antifascism in Croatia are associated with World War II.

So why on earth would he attend the Days of Antifascism and give them a current relevance? Bizarre.

He warned that the disempowered parts of society are inclined towards undemocratic options, that it’s easy to gain their following, there are, for example, offensive words directed towards players of different colour at a football match, he said and continued:

“We must not forget that the virus of radicalism can easily contaminate the society. Social crisis is where this virus finds fruitful ground. One model has come against the wall, liberal kind of capitalism obviously gives no answers to the problems which we encounter. What’s happening in Greece and elsewhere is a dangerous symptom we must think about, I’m not sure that we have recognised the right way out of this. The problem is how to create more in socially acceptable ways, and the key of success is to find a way to work more and better. Work is the foundation of prosperity and democracy, and the essence is in fair allocation. If we don’t find a way for economic recovery in Europe and in Croatia we’ll face a crisis of large consequences. Croatia is predominantly a democratic society, it’s sensitivity to social justice is pronounced, but all that won’t be enough if every day, in every activity, we are not ready to work at the essence of democracy, in the first instance at freedom, social equality and equal chances for all. Let’s do everything so that Croatia gets as close as possible to that ideal.”

It’s obvious that Josipovic and Croatian antifascists are mimicking the sentiments of leftist (antifascist) organisations of UK and other Western countries where the economic woes resulting in unemployment and poverty are used to advance the idea that left politics are the “savior” of democracy or peace. For example, in September 2011, Jamie Pitman, a UK left inclined, in response to the English Defence League protests said:   “…in times of austerity and a poor economic climate, fascism and racism can flourish. We need to beat fascism by turning out in bigger numbers than them – not resorting to violence but providing a bigger show of strength.”

So, Josipovic is saying nothing original when he said: “Social crisis is where this virus finds fruitful ground”. It’s really what Pitman said a few months ago in London and what other leftists have undoubtedly said before him.

The Croatian Antifascist (a.k.a. Communist) political currents are keeping “Fascism” alive through their rhetoric and scaremongering while purposefully suppressing the very facts upon which Communism arose as a political force that seized state power. It was back in 1917, October Revolution in Russia – the Communists were the extremist radicals (if we’re to use Josipovic’s label for modern movements of national pride fuelled by economic crises). The Yugoslav Communists were no better than the Russian ones; while fighting against “Fascism” they also cut the finishing blow in 1945 by deposing the King. It’s difficult to give credence to Antifascists’ finger pointing at Fascists when it comes to aggression and radicalism when Antifascists practiced the same; they just haven’t been answerable for their aggressive and radical deeds.

As a point of interest, the former president of Croatia, Stjepan Mesic, also attended the Days of Antifascism in Opatije. He too shed his political party membership when he became the president in 2000.

There doesn’t seem to be much of political independence in either Josipovic’s or Mesic’s office of the president of Croatia. One wonders whether their activities in the Antifascist arena keep a nation (Croatia) at constant loggerheads for its World War II history; stifle the smooth progress of democracy. How difficult can it be to place both Fascism and Antifascism firmly into history, not just say they belong to history?

Franjo Tudjman

The thought flows with nostalgia to the days when dr Franjo Tudjman sat in that office, reconciling the past belongings, pursuing ways to unite historically divided political winds of Croatia into a spanking new democracy where both the right and the left politics had a place and the mandate to compete for peoples’ trust, without the decades old history calling the shots. Ina Vukic, Prof.; B.A., M.A.Ps. (Syd)


  1. J Pervan says:

    Nostalgia for Tudjman? That’s a good one. With his party in control of Croatia for the last 20 years and the corruption that it has wrought on the Croatian people, it”s difficult to be nostalgic for something that never left in the first place.

    • If his party had control or majority of votes that’s the will of the people – democratic votes. The corruption was an inheritance embedded in society from 50 years of Communist rule and it usually takes decades to get rid of it or reduce it to a level that occurs in all societies of the world. Tudjman went about giving everyone a chance no matter whether left or right, reconcile the past and move forward. Great progress was made in his lifetime in power which was swiftly eroded and erosion started from the left wingers from 1993. If you take the time and research you would discover that most of those who have come under the spotlight for corruption there are those who had learned their trade during communist rule where they held either high positions or were members of that party during the life of Communist Yugoslavia.

  2. Michael Silovic says:

    Interesting article! After giving it some thought one must remember that in a true democracy there are voices that must be heard and not judged as antifascist or fascist but as an ideologically exposed expression of ones belief that freedom in a democratic society allows such tolerance as freedom of speech right or wrong .Because of some of my political beliefs would one suggest that I am a fascist communist because of my Croatia First Policy .In order for a country to have a true democracy we need to have both fascist and antifascist society to keep balance and control of our government.I would prefer that those two words not be used when two parties disagree with one another on differences of opinions or political policy as they are more geared to the former political alliances of our country.I am not understanding why our president would use such language as radical some ideas that people espouse.One must not always agree and be a puppet of any government and just go along as this is just as dangerous . It should never be left up to any government to decide who is radical and who is not. This opinion should be left up to the people in our society to determine whether they support ones view.For such a small country our president should not be trying to divide one another for any gain.

    • Exactly my thought too. If Josipovic says fascism and antifascism belong to WWII then he should live by example and not attend antifascist meetings nor acknowledge them or give them importance. Indeed democracy is the right to express any beliefs, even radical ones. Not just express but act on them politically if there’s the will among the people to follow.

  3. Reblogged this on HDZ – pokret za modernu Hrvatsku.

  4. Who uses these terms in modern political discourse? Seems so outdated. If we don’t change the language we use, we’ll never start the change process. It’s just left or right spectrum politics. It’s about a competition of ideas not branding people – this is an authoritarian mindset of either political dimension. Informed, literate, conscientious and engaged public is the best solution!

  5. Michael Silovic says:

    That is exactly my point.The terminology used should not be used in describing people in a democracy. But I see that in this particular article it was used by our president in such a manner I deem unfit for a politician to utter. While I have no concern if I am labeled a fascist because of my belief in a CROATIA FIRST POLICY I will always argue my point that we need not look to others to solve our problems but to look at our our own people and government to put all of us and Croatia first in any affairs.If someone deems this policy as fascist so then be it but I would rather be called a fascist then a puppet. The real problem we are facing in our country is we are trying to accomplish to much in such a short period of time with out giving clear and conscious thought to what we are doing and the end goal of success. Why the rush is beyond me. The most important issue that our government should be working on is creating an atmosphere for people to return to Croatia to live and support the local economy rather then worry about the global economy and its participation.

Leave a Reply to inavukicCancel reply

Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions:

All content on “Croatia, the War, and the Future” blog is for informational purposes only. “Croatia, the War, and the Future” blog is not responsible for and expressly disclaims all liability for the interpretations and subsequent reactions of visitors or commenters either to this site or its associate Twitter account, @IVukic or its Facebook account. Comments on this website are the sole responsibility of their writers and the writer will take full responsibility, liability, and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment. The nature of information provided on this website may be transitional and, therefore, accuracy, completeness, veracity, honesty, exactitude, factuality and politeness of comments are not guaranteed. This blog may contain hypertext links to other websites or webpages. “Croatia, the War, and the Future” does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness or completeness of information on any other website or webpage. We do not endorse or accept any responsibility for any views expressed or products or services offered on outside sites, or the organisations sponsoring those sites, or the safety of linking to those sites. Comment Policy: Everyone is welcome and encouraged to voice their opinion regardless of identity, politics, ideology, religion or agreement with the subject in posts or other commentators. Personal or other criticism is acceptable as long as it is justified by facts, arguments or discussions of key issues. Comments that include profanity, offensive language and insults will be moderated.