Race For UN Secretary General Drenched By Former Yugoslavia

UN Assembly 13 April 2016 Hearing what Secretary General candidates have to say UN Photo/ Rick Bojornas

UN Assembly 13 April 2016
Hearing what Secretary General candidates
have to say
UN Photo/ Rick Bojornas

The UN Secretary General candidature basket seems to be overflowing with candidates from most states of former Yugoslavia (that communist contraption that broke apart in 1990’s) – five (out of six), in fact: Danilo Turk, former President of Slovenia and former UN Assistant Secretary General; Igor Luksic, Montenegro’s Foreign Minister; Vesna Pusic, former Minister of Foreign and European Affairs of Croatia, Vuk Jeremic, former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Serbia, former President of UN General Assembly, Srgjan Kerim, former Foreign Affairs Minister of Macedonia and former president of UN General Assembly. The only one missing from this former Yugoslavia club of UN Sec-Gen hopefuls is a candidate from Bosnia and Herzegovina.

The United Nations member states sat for three days last week at the East River headquarters and didn’t hesitate in giving the nine official candidates vying for the position of U.N. chief their toughest job interview to date. In the three-day publicly broadcasted informal dialogues, the nine secretary-general candidates answered approximately 800 questions collectively, according to the 1 for 7 Billion Campaign — ranging from their would-be policy concerning the alleged sexual abuse cases within the U.N.’s peacekeeping operations to concrete reform plans for the secretariat they’re hoping to lead.



This was a radical departure from how things were done previously. For the past 70 years, the five veto-wielding members of the Security Council (China, France, Russia, United Kingdom and United States) pretty much picked the Secretary General behind closed doors. Given the strong push for a woman to finally lead the UNO and especially from Eastern Europe – wagging tongues whisper – all male candidates noticeably padded their “women’s platforms” with tired old promises of more women representation in key UN positions, some including appointing a woman as their deputy secretary-general and, wouldn’t you know it: Serbia’s Vuk Jeremic even said he would be only too happy to name his selection (woman) ahead of elections! Oh dear, pity nobody asked him to show there and then how many women deputies he had in his past high positions in Serbia and the UN itself (General Assembly)! Jeremic said that a “revitalized United Nations” should be the “centrepiece of global governance” under the leadership of the Secretary General – using big words without really saying what he means; political drivel of a high order.

Vuk Jeremic

Vuk Jeremic


In an attempt to mitigate their disadvantage on the score that a woman should be the next Secretary General, Igor Luksic of Montenegro promised to appoint a female deputy. Danilo Turk of Slovenia made the argument that geographic fairness was as important as gender equality.

Vesna Pusic

Vesna Pusic

As the incoming Croatian government would have never nominated her, Vesna Pusic was quick to secure a “last minute in office” nomination by the outgoing former government, which was loaded with communist undertones and appalling organisational skills or results. Yet she had the gall to say at East River last week that the first priority for the new UN Secretary-General should be “to make the organization work.” So let’s suppose that the UNO does not work (which I think is a wrong supposition) – judging by her previous performance in high positions of governance, she would not know how to make an organisation work if a solution bit her on the buttocks. She was Deputy-Prime Minister of Croatia that saw hugely gaping divisions and despair in society Croatia had not seen for decades! She could not make modern and democratic Croatia work, how could she even think that she could make the UNO work!


Vesna Pusic said that her native country Croatia, had managed the transition from war to a stable peace, following the Balkan wars of the 1990s, thanks in part to the UN. Yes, but she failed to say that she personally and her political parties walked out of the Croatian Parliament and refused to fight for democracy as opposed to communism in Croatia. No wonder Croatia’s First Deputy Prime Minister Tomislav Karamarko said last Sunday 17 April that “Vesna Pusic is not their choice for the UN Secretary General candidate and that he personally would never vote for her but that she will have access to technical support of the government,” such as access to diplomatic missions’ buildings etc., while Prime Minister Tihomir Oreskovic said that his government “will not obstruct her candidacy” and in such a way this may be construed as support.
Saudi Arabia representative was quick to address Vesna Pusic after she shared her views on LGBT rights, highlighting her supposed “attitude” toward the U.N. as an institution and to its members, and cautioned her against “any attempt for the imposition of social values that are not internationally accepted, and that are not commonly recognized on the entire system.” Pusic, after taking a deep breath, argued she has never in her 63 years of existence seen an organization or individual not flawed, adding later that her knowing and acknowledging these flaws makes her even more qualified for the job.



Oh dear, what a misguided fool!


Igor Luksic

Igor Luksic

Igor Luksic from Montenegro stressed the importance of promoting women in top U.N. posts and said if the secretary-general is from a country in the developed north, the deputy secretary-general should be from the developing south. And he proposed that the deputy secretary-general be based in Nairobi to focus on implementing the new U.N. goals for 2030 to tackle poverty and preserve the environment as well as key regional issues.

Danilo Türk Photo: Daniel Novakovic/STA

Danilo Türk
Photo: Daniel Novakovic/STA

Danilo Turk’s, from Slovenia, priorities for the UN Secretary General are security issues in crisis areas in Africa, the Middle East and elsewhere. Attention should also be devoted to sustainable development and support services, which are responsible for the implementation of the set goals. He also suggested faster appointment of new personnel in the UN, especially when it comes to field work, and simplify the procedure for adopting the budget. A practical vision including that there should be a global framework for dealing with refugee crisis.

Srgjan Kerim Photo: AP Photo/ Bebeto Matthews

Srgjan Kerim
Photo: AP Photo/ Bebeto Matthews

Srgjan Kerim, a former Macedonian foreign minister and ex-General Assembly president, stressed the importance of following the unwritten rule of rotation, saying Thursday 14 April it maintains “mutual trust” and promotes needed unity at a time the world is facing many crises.


Other candidates so far are:





Irina Bokova, Former Acting Minister of Foreign Affairs of Bulgaria; current Director-General of UNESCO

Irina Bokova,
Former Acting Minister of
Foreign Affairs of Bulgaria;
current Director-General of UNESCO



Natalia Gherman, former Minister of Foreign Affairs and European Integration of Moldova, former Acting Prime Minister of Moldova

Natalia Gherman,
former Minister of Foreign
Affairs and European Integration of Moldova,
Acting Prime Minister of Moldova


Helen Clark, former Prime Minister of New Zealand, current Administrator of the UN Development Program

Helen Clark,
former Prime Minister of New Zealand,
current Administrator of
the UN Development Program



António Guterres, former Prime Minister of Portugal, former UN High Commissioner for Refugees

António Guterres,
former Prime Minister of Portugal,
former UN High Commissioner for Refugees


Despite the wide range of topics discussed during the dialogues last week, certain subjects were barely mentioned, or perhaps avoided. Syria and what a candidate proposes to do about it if he/she became the Secretary General was, for example, not floated as a question at all. Odd! Really odd given the millions of refugees out of Syria flooding Turkey, Lebanon and Europe…given the well of Islamic terrorist furor spreading into the world from there. July 2016 is the time we may expect to know which candidate has been selected and while there may be more candidates to come  I sincerely trust (and I count, if for nothing else, then because my taxes contribute to the UN membership fees my country pays into the UN coffers) the selected will not be Vesna Pusic or Vuk Jeremic. Ina Vukic, Prof. (Zgb); B.A.,M.A.Ps. (Syd)


  1. Of course, as a NZer, I would like Helen Clark to be the next SG. 😉

    • Me too – I think Helen Clark tops them all in qualifications and strength needed for the position – she has proven an amazing sense of direction as a leader

  2. interesting post, as always, dear friend

  3. Genuine growth and progress may continue to elude the UN if politics as usual permeated the process. It’s like the facade that’s going on in U.S. campaigning now. This post heightens our awareness of how wrought ‘the system’ continues to be, Ina. Thanks for the informative share.

    • So agree with you, Eric, there should be tighter criteria for candidature or UN Sec Gen but then the world would need to invent a whole new “human motor” (with a whole new clean team of people) to drive the decent system you and I would like to see

  4. There are lots of ‘misguided fools ‘ out in the political arena dear Ina.. Sadly..

    I do not profess to know any of these Candidates.. Head too much in my Cabbage patch 😉 xxx

    • There sure are, Sue – it’s just painful to have to be exposed to them. Hugs

      • They need exposing Ina.. Too many wave their sticks and say follow my rules while breaking them themselves…

        I feel at some point in the ‘distant future’ People will begin to see through them..
        This latest exposure of the Panama Papers of those profiting from Tax havens .. The Iceland PM resigned and David Cameron’s Father.leading officials here to make public their tax returns..
        When my hubby retired from work the Tax office sent him a demand for £4-35p owing.. adding if not paid he would be fined or prosecuted .. LOL Well he paid it.. 🙂
        While other huge companies and individuals evade and get away with Millions!..
        It is time for exposure on a grand scale
        Love and Hugs Ina xxx

      • Indeed so, Sue – no mercy when it comes to taxes for them for they get to enjoy roads transport hospitals etc paid from taxes so they need to contribute Hugs hus <3

      • 🙂 <3

  5. Weekend placut Ina ! 🙂
    Cu respect,

  6. What I find odd is that the candidates all seem to feel that the geographical location and gender are the best qualities of a deputy… as opposed to actually considering their worth and merit and intellectual capacity.
    Wanting a global action to the refugee crisis is all good – but does that mean there will be a global response to the 11 million illegals in the US – and counting!
    Not to mention the very lacking transparency of their budget – take a look at the internal pay scales – vacations, benefits etc… it is obscene.

  7. Lets not forget Vesna Pusic’s refusal to speak to a group of war widows and woman whom were sexually abused (raped) by serbian chetnik forces during the war. Vesna Pusic suggested that they may find their rights amongst the gay movement marching in the streets.!? Several conclusions can be wrestled with what Vesna Pusic wanted to say with her remarks.


  1. […] bias towards his/her own country. UN Secretary General is a job for the world not one country and everyone has a right to give opinion about any of the candidates. I am more than certain that those in Croatia who have and do criticise her and say she is not […]

Leave a Reply

Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions:

All content on “Croatia, the War, and the Future” blog is for informational purposes only. “Croatia, the War, and the Future” blog is not responsible for and expressly disclaims all liability for the interpretations and subsequent reactions of visitors or commenters either to this site or its associate Twitter account, @IVukic or its Facebook account. Comments on this website are the sole responsibility of their writers and the writer will take full responsibility, liability, and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment. The nature of information provided on this website may be transitional and, therefore, accuracy, completeness, veracity, honesty, exactitude, factuality and politeness of comments are not guaranteed. This blog may contain hypertext links to other websites or webpages. “Croatia, the War, and the Future” does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness or completeness of information on any other website or webpage. We do not endorse or accept any responsibility for any views expressed or products or services offered on outside sites, or the organisations sponsoring those sites, or the safety of linking to those sites. Comment Policy: Everyone is welcome and encouraged to voice their opinion regardless of identity, politics, ideology, religion or agreement with the subject in posts or other commentators. Personal or other criticism is acceptable as long as it is justified by facts, arguments or discussions of key issues. Comments that include profanity, offensive language and insults will be moderated.
%d bloggers like this: