Croatia: Taste Of Marx’s Theory Of Socialism In President’s Marginalisation

Banner at Zagreb Protest
against Serbia’s President Aleksandar Vucic
12 February 2018
Banner says: “Serbia must answer for genocide in Croatia
and pay war damages”
Photo: Davor Kovacevic

Stating her official presidential view about the people who protested against the arrival of Serbia’s president Aleksandar Vucic in Croatia, many of who were Croatia’s Homeland War veterans and war widows, Croatia’s president Kolinda Grabar Kitarovic said:

“…We cannot permit individuals from the margins of the political spectrum or from the margins of any type of thinking dictate our politics.” (HRT TV News 13 February 2017)
Prsident Grabar Kitarovic concluded that the policies and inter-state relations should be determined “by us, statesmen and stateswomen, as well as a vast majority of our citizens who support Mr Vucic’s visit to Croatia…”!

Marginalisation is defined as exclusion from meaningful participation in society. Marginalisation in a broader sense can refer to a lack access to vital information and public discussion and thereby the marginalised’s ability to participate in public affairs and act as citizens is thwarted or devalued.

The idea of powerlessness that marginalisation brings links to Marx’s theory of socialism: some people “have” power while others “have not”. The powerless are dominated by the ruling class and are situated to take orders and rarely have the right to give them.

Some of the fundamental injustices associated with powerlessness are inhibition to develop one’s capacities, lack of decision-making power, and exposure to disrespectful treatment because of the lowered status.

Oppression at its “best”.

Given that people who attended the protest come from all positions on the political spectrum (from left to right/ or vice versa) it is not clear which one of these the president considers marginal. It is also not clear whether she actually meant only to label as marginal citizens the individuals who dared to protest.

It is clear that by labeling protesters against Serbia’s president’s visit Grabar Kitarovic employed a yet another distasteful tactic to suppress the many attempts, including those by a number of Members of Croatian Parliament, that called for Aleksandar Vucic’s both personal and state apology for the horror of aggression they waged against Croatia in the early 1990’s.

It is clear that everyone attending the protest felt directly insulted by the president’s insinuation of marginality. The media went wild. The president won no brownie points within her electorate (the Croatian voters) but lost quite a few. The protesters won quite a swell in support throughout Croatia and resentment about being considered as marginal spread like the Bubonic plague.

Presideent Grabar Kitarovic would have done well for her political agenda had she researched the enormous potential in political power marginalised people can assemble. She would have discovered that, for instance, the people in Britain who felt that they had been pushed to the margins of society were actually the driving force behind Brexit (Joseph Rowntree Foundation 2016 research findings). While the marginal people in this case of Brexit votes are those belonging to society’s margins of income and education etc. the Croatian president has created marginal groups for public discussion input, which of course, could come back and bite her at next presidential elections were she in mind to run.

Vucic’s visit to Croatia accompanied by Grabar Kitarovic’s marginalisation of freedom of opinion of some and the angst, the revolts, the protests all this has caused among a significant part of the community may yet prove to be a “wake up call” for those who insist that reconciliation cannot occur unless the Homeland War history and associated issues are reconciled first. And they are many! Certainly they cannot depend on their president with much certainty. Vucic or Serbia will most likely never give in to demands for war damage reparation not for full disclosure of all missing persons from the War. And Vucic said as much during his visit to Zagreb.

In 1991, the government in Belgrade, Serbia, aided the rebellion of ethnic Serbs in Croatia, who seized control of nearly one-third of the country and expelled hundreds of thousands of Croats. The tables turned in 1995, when about 200,000 ethnic Serbs fled to Serbia, despite being asked by Croatia’s leadership to remain in Croatia, when the Croatian army retook the occupied territory. An estimated 20,000 people were killed and thousands are still missing from the five years of conflict.

As for the past, we agree on almost nothing, but at least we understand that the other side has a different view,” said Vucic, who as a lawmaker during the war urged Croatian ethnic Serbs to attack Croats and hold onto the occupied and ethnically cleansed of Croats territory. “However, Serbia and Croatia will have to forge much better relations in the future, whether politicians like it or not,” he concluded almost defiantly.

Since when did real and brutal aggression become a matter of view!?

With Grabar Kitarovic’s energy focused on the process of being more friendly with Serbia at the expense of blotting out or suppressing or pussyfooting around burning issues from the War and Serbia’s aggression, there’s a danger the concerns of people at home will be ignored further. And there you have a formula for endless more years of despair and disquiet.

So much for her being the president of all Croatians! She has just sent groups of Croatian citizens into marginalised social standing or outer limit or edge of society. She has excluded the protesters from participating with recognition on the discourse about genuine public interests. I do look toward coming across Grabar Kitarovic’s clarification as to which groups from the anti-Vucic protests she considers to be on margins of thinking or political spectrum. The Croatian Homeland War veterans involved have a duty towards the state of Croatia to seek clarification of this. Ina Vukic


  1. Stevie10703 says:

    Let’s also not forget that she labeled anyone questioning the Serbian President about his words in Glina 25 years ago as “govor mrznje” (hate speech).

    If he came to Croatia and renounced the Greater Serbian ambition, then great. But he did not.

    If he came to Croatia to apologize for what they did during the war where they ethnically cleansed Croatians from their own homes, then great. But he did not.

    If he came here to pledge war reparations to Croatia, then great. But he did not.

    This is a man who worked side by side with Seselj during the war who still to this day has ambitions of a greater Serbia and will now probably push autonomy of the Serbs in Croatia and if he ever gets that then you will slowly see him pushing for that area to be a part of Serbia. Yet, he will not do the same for the Hungarian and Croatian communities in Serbia who are treated far worse than the Serbs in Croatia.

    Then you have our President who showed a disregard for her people by inviting this war criminal to Croatia to spit on the graves on all those killed during our war for independence.

    • An awful, awful taste in Croatia is left now, Stevie, that’s for sure. While it’s normal for the president to say that Serbs in Croatia are citizens of Croatia also one simply does not do it at the expense of Croats, i.e. by belittling their grievances, which are major, to do with Serb aggression and brutality in the nineties. My head spins.

      • Stevie10703 says:

        I will give the Serbs credit…they are not afraid to vote in two war criminals as their President and Prime Minister…and then you have Seselj and his party in their Sabor and they have numbers. This is who they voted in and are ok with it. Meanwhile, our people afraid of their own shadows and are looking like the Italians where there is a new government every 6 months, or so it seems. Meanwhile, we have Pupovac in our Sabor and Stanimirovic who was a war criminal plus that ethnic Italian all three of which hate the country…the point is, you cannot have peace with people who don’t want peace and Vucic doesn’t want peace with Croatia because he still feels it is a part of Serbia.

      • So true, Stevie

  2. Stevie10703, correct! So successive governments have swept the crimes from WWII -1990 under the carpet and HDZ are restricting access to archives yet again. Now KGK is doing the same for 1990 – 1995.

    Croatia does not need a good looking “fina”president, it needs one that looks after Croatia’s national interests. Her partisan parents would be proud of her this week.

    She simply did not represent the people, nor communicate the death destruction and fear people walk around with to this day.

    Imagine how the people of Vukovar, Skabrinje and all veterans feel.

    Why invite someone like this and not prepare, or was this prepared? In the diplomatic world you only invite a leader of a nation once discussion points and outcomes are agreed. That’s the scary realisation!

    Is it not natural to ask for a apology?
    Is it not natural to ask for the locations of all our fallen soldiers?
    Is it not natural to ask are you going to pay for the destruction of Croatian towns and Villages?

    No amount of pressure form the EU would create such a situation. This is all about Croatian politicians and their inability to do the right thing stand up for their own people.

    If it walks like a duck, sounds like a duck…….its a duck!

  3. I think the President should have asked for an apology and not been so vague or possibly confusing. I think helping the marginalised to feel included is important and to allow all to express themselves is important in a democracy, as long as it is not mean, prejudiced or oppressing.
    Our own President is not good and has so many idiotic ideas it is not funny!

  4. Ina, hope you are well, happy and this situation will get resolved! ❤ 🕊️ xo

  5. Speaking of the marginalized, I read an interesting quote recently.

    “Politics have always been the systematic organization of hatreds.” Henry Adams

    • There’s much truth in that quote, Ben – there’s nothing like even the word “hatred” that evokes and stirs reactions probably because hatred is something nobody wants to be the recipient of. It keeps the powerful and the powerless at attention at all times and the observes get to isolate issues that may bring salvation. Here’s to hoping in a seemingly hopeless world

  6. The Croatian marginalized people will not have any power because they will stay loyal and keep voting for the HDZ (the corrupted HDZ).

    Even before Vucic’s arrival in Zagreb HDZ parliamentarian Ivan Suker spoke on the Toronto Croatian radio program talking about how the politicians must take care of things ordinary people can’t understand (or something to that effect).

    We, the patriotic Croats, to the Croat “gospoda”, the elites ruling us, are like the “deplorables” that Hilary Clinton despises in the USA.

    BTW -I respect Vucic for protecting the interests of his people. I wish that we Croats had a guardian to protect our interests.

    • Zeljko, I suppose most people would tolerate being led by true elites, Croatia has none! Only the self-proclaimed ones and they’re a dime a dozen. Hopeless. But, I do get the fact that sheer voter numbers can create elites or seeming elites to their own detriment. A wake up call should start ringing from Vucic’s visit.

  7. Loads of information in one post


  1. […] Croatia: Taste Of Marx’s Theory Of Socialism In President’s Marginalisation // Croatia, the War, and the FutureBanner at Zagreb Protestagainst Serbia’s President Aleksandar Vucic12 February 2018Banner says: “Serbia must answer for genocide in Croatiaand pay war damages”Photo: Davor Kovacevic […]

Leave a Reply

Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions:

All content on “Croatia, the War, and the Future” blog is for informational purposes only. “Croatia, the War, and the Future” blog is not responsible for and expressly disclaims all liability for the interpretations and subsequent reactions of visitors or commenters either to this site or its associate Twitter account, @IVukic or its Facebook account. Comments on this website are the sole responsibility of their writers and the writer will take full responsibility, liability, and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment. The nature of information provided on this website may be transitional and, therefore, accuracy, completeness, veracity, honesty, exactitude, factuality and politeness of comments are not guaranteed. This blog may contain hypertext links to other websites or webpages. “Croatia, the War, and the Future” does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness or completeness of information on any other website or webpage. We do not endorse or accept any responsibility for any views expressed or products or services offered on outside sites, or the organisations sponsoring those sites, or the safety of linking to those sites. Comment Policy: Everyone is welcome and encouraged to voice their opinion regardless of identity, politics, ideology, religion or agreement with the subject in posts or other commentators. Personal or other criticism is acceptable as long as it is justified by facts, arguments or discussions of key issues. Comments that include profanity, offensive language and insults will be moderated.
%d bloggers like this: