The first article titled “Call MM when you want to smear Croatia” was published here on 18 March 2023 and this is the second instalment on concerning matters connected to Michael Martens (MM) as correspondent of the “Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung” (FAZ) newspaper for Southeast Europe.
Written by Dr. Josip Stjepandic
Translated into English by Ina Vukic
The position of Croats in Bosnia and Herzegovina is truly intolerable. Almost all of them were expelled from Republika Srpska under Serbian domination in the 1990s. Returnees are threatened and sometimes killed by numerous Serbian extremists, as shown by the recent case in Derventa . In the other half of the country (Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina), they are – although equal according to the constitution – under enormous political pressure from the Bosniaks (Muslims), who want to do in peacetime what the Serbs succeeded in the war: subjugate and ultimately displace the Croats. On top of that, there are the so-called representatives of the international community, who mostly behave as Muslim, Bosniak, lobbyists. The Austrians Wolfgang Petritsch and Valentin Inzko are remembered as bad because, as high representatives, they significantly reduced the political rights of Croats. As icing on the bitter cake, there are journalists like Michael Martens who always manage to write unfavourable things about Croats without talking to them first.
In his article “Power play over gas pipelines: Where does gas still come from Russia” (FAZ, February 28, 2024 Michael Martens describes how Bosnia and Herzegovina could become independent of Russian gas by building an additional gas pipeline. However, this is (he claims) hindered by the “evil Herzegovinian Croats” led by Dragan Covic, supported by the Prime Minister of Croatia, Andrej Plenkovic.
First of all, the author does not ask why such a fierce campaign is being led for the so-called “southern interconnection”. Ten years could pass before this pipeline is built and by then the Russian aggression against Ukraine could be over, so the best gas supplier would be decided upon based on the changed situation and other criteria anyway. The estimated annual turnover of 80 million euros for each large supplier is of minor importance.
Judging by the graphic (map) placed as part of his article (see Screenshot image above), which shows a diagram of Bosnia and Herzegovina, it seems that the author most likely did not understand the real problem at all. According to the diagram, the gas pipeline in question, about 130 km long, runs from the Croatian border to Travnik in central Bosnia and Herzegovina, mainly through Bosnia. An uninformed reader of Martens’ article could conclude that Croats from Herzegovina are meddling in matters that do not concern them at all. Why are they angry and want to run their business through a newly founded operating company in Mostar when the gas pipeline does not pass through their area? The author ignores the fact that the gas pipeline passes exclusively through areas inhabited by a majority Croatian population, such as Zavrsje (Tropolje), which is not part of Bosnia or Herzegovina. Therefore, it is a legitimate right to co-manage an important economic asset. Had he asked the Croats the author would have found this out.
Such an economic policy has its roots and tradition since 1918. Austria-Hungary was the last power to invest in the majority Croatian area. The narrow-gauge railway, which once provided modest mobility and transport, was discontinued without replacement in communist Yugoslavia. There are no highways, no major factories, no power plants, no major hospitals, and no universities in Croatian regions – after all, according to the opinion of a “well-connected interlocutor in Sarajevo” (evidently of Bosniak nationality), Croats should also lose the right to defend themselves against injustice!?
In Sarajevo, there is a gas distribution company called BH Gas, which is responsible for supplying the central region of Bosnia and Herzegovina with Russian gas. However, the company is in serious financial problems because it is threatened with an additional payment in the arbitration procedure in the amount higher than the half-yearly turnover. The special feature of BH Gas is its management structure. Along with Serb Mihajlo Krmotic, there are 9 Bosniaks and no Croats. This is equality Sarajevo style!
The author, as well as a powerful transatlantic partner, dispute that a new operating company should be established for the planned part of the gas pipeline, which should be completed in ten years. However, apart from BH Gas, there are two more gas pipeline companies in the Serbian Republic: Gas Promet from Pale and Sarajevo-Gas from East Sarajevo, which are responsible for 19 and 40 km of the gas pipeline, respectively. Everything is laid out and can be read in the last available BH Gas annual report for 2021, which is available online under the title “Annual report for 2017”! Logical conclusion from this would lead one to conclude: All (constitutional) nationalities can manage the gas business in Bosnia and Herzegovina except Croats.
Besides this, this is a long-term project of alternative gas supply for the central area of Bosnia and Herzegovina through a pipeline that has two sections; one around Sarajevo which is inhabited predominantly by Bosniaks, and then towards Mostar, (which has yet to be built), which is inhabited by approximately half Croats and half Bosniaks. Does anyone serious in Washington, Berlin, Brussels really consider it appropriate to build such a capital project on antagonism and even hostility towards Croats from day one? What kind of reaction is expected from the Croats, if they are thrown out of the game from day one? Not to mention the mutual trust and unity of the three peoples in Bosnia and Herzegovina that is only held together by external pressure.
In Germany and the USA, the gas market is highly decentralised. Gas business in Germany traditionally takes place in the Ruhr region – far from the capital of Berlin. The situation is similar in Washington. Why then does everything in the multi-ethnic state of Bosnia and Herzegovina have to be strictly centralised under the leadership of the Bosniaks, who have proven in the last 30 years that they cannot move the country forward? Isn’t it time to put parts of the economy in the hands of the Croats, who, through private initiative, economically developed their areas better than the politically dominant Bosniaks and Serbs? The gas infrastructure is quite widespread in Croatia, so there are many experienced experts who would probably be ready to take on a responsible position in Mostar. No Croat, who has an existential alternative, would voluntarily go to Sarajevo today, where there is a daily media hunt against Croats.
What a failed energy policy looks like is shown by numerous wind turbines in Croatian areas that were installed by Chinese investors, are managed by Sarajevo companies, but are otherwise idle because there is no connection to the grid!
If the wealth attributed to Dragan Covic is real, then he is surely and deeply, corrupt. Unfortunately, this is no different to what is found among politicians of today’s Bosnia and Herzegovina. But what can we say about the Bosniak oligarchy in Sarajevo, where, for example, a fake university diploma is enough to make a career as a head of gynaecology and a university professor, like Sebija Izetbegovic, the wife of the most powerful Bosniak politician Bakir, who was dismissed in the meantime?
Covic should certainly be faulted for tolerating the doctoring of BH Gas’s balance sheet and for not putting in motion bankruptcy proceedings yet. Then at least the financial situation would be clear, and some accusations removed.
And finally: If all Croatian politicians in Bosnia and Herzegovina were corrupt, is this a reason for denying Croats all management rights in state-owned companies?
Michael Martens is an experienced journalist who appears to know his job well, and FAZ was the most respected newspaper in Germany. Their inappropriate actions should therefore be viewed very critically because they write about Croats using what they hear from unnamed sources in Belgrade and Sarajevo. Unfortunately, it looks like they’re returning to the slogan: “Call M.M. when you want to smear Croatia” .
Dr. Josip Stjepandic, President, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts in the Diaspora and Homeland