If ICTY Majority Judges Sat At Nuremberg, Most Nazi Leaders Would Be Free

Memorial cemetery for victims of Vukovar Hospital 1991 massacre Photo: Associated Press

Memorial cemetery for victims of Vukovar Hospital 1991 massacre
Photo: Associated Press

It is said that the ICTY will close shop in 2014. There are still cases pending completion both in Trial and Appeal Chambers. Judging from the length of time previous cases had taken to completion it’s obvious that one year is nowhere near enough for due process to be satisfied under same conditions. ICTY’s “exit plan” or completion strategy may involve referral of cases to other existing international jurisdictions, create new mechanisms for dealing with the remainder of cases, refer cases to “local” jurisdictions in countries of the region, etc.  Whatever happens one thing should be kept in mind: due process deserves and demands similar conditions to those provided to completed cases.

Besides delivering its farcical and grotesque judgment against the 6 Croats from Herceg-Bosna (and the long deceased Croatian leadership headed by Franjo Tudjman)  on 29 May, on 30 May the ICTY Trial Chamber proved that its reasoning and judgment are indeed as grotesque as grotesque can possibly get.

On 30 May it brought down its decision in the case of Jovica Stanisic and Franko Simatovic – Serbs who were charged with having directed, organised, equipped, trained, armed and financed units of the Serbian State Security Service which murdered, persecuted, deported and forcibly transferred non-Serb civilians from Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) and Croatia between 1991 and 1995.

The majority of Trial Chamber, Judge Picard dissenting, acquitted of all charges Jovica Stanisic and Franko Simatovic, former Chief of the Serbian State Security Service and former employee of the Serbian State Security Service.

The Chamber today found that those units committed the crimes of deportation, forcible transfer and murder at numerous locations in those two countries, and that they constitute persecution as a crime against humanity.
However, the Chamber found that Stanisic and Simatovic cannot be held criminally responsible for these crimes. After analysing evidence, the majority, Judge Picard dissenting, was unable to conclude that the accused shared the intent to further the common criminal purpose of the joint criminal enterprise. The Chamber also found that it was not proven beyond reasonable doubt that Stanisic or Simatovic planned or ordered the crimes. With regard to the allegations of aiding and abetting, the majority determined, Judge Picard dissenting, that in the instances that the two accused rendered assistance to the special units, this assistance was not specifically directed towards the commission of crimes”.

The decision (Judgment Summary PDF here) comes as a shock, to put it mildly.  It’s a second shock delivered by ICTY Trial Chamber within one week!

The records and evidence clearly show that Stanisic and Simatovic had been leaders in the ethnic cleansing enterprise of non-Serb population, had known that subordinates were committing crimes, and had done nothing to stop them.
The facts of the times covered by this case, the facts of Serb aggression against Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina are at distressing disagreement with this ICTY decision. The ICTY decision does not match factual history. It was actually forced deportations (ethnic cleansing) of non-Serb population that marked the start of the war. In Croatia these crimes were committed by Croatian Serb paramilitary forces and Jugoslav Peoples Army orchestrated and led by its Belgrade headquarters.

The ICTY Trial Chamber, amidst all the evidence pointing to Serbia’s involvement in the joint criminal enterprise against Croatia (and Bosnia and Herzegovina) and all the possible affirming conclusions it could have safely made from those facts, for its finding of exonerating Serbia of participating in joint criminal enterprise, evidently relied quite a bit on the fact that Serbia had not provided to the court any documentary or otherwise evidence as to the content of the meetings held in Belgrade between the accused and Serbia’s leadership, including Slobodan Milosevic!
The Chamber noted that it had not received evidence about what was discussed at the meeting called by Stanisic…”, at 27 min 41 sec in ICTY Trial Chamber video of 30 May 2013 below.

Yet, in the case against the 6 Croats of Herceg-Bosna on 29 May 2013 the ICTY Trial Chamber took it upon itself to convict defenceless dead men (Croatian leaders Franjo Tudjman, Janko Bobetko, Gojko Susak, Mate Boban) of “planning and executing a joint criminal enterprise against Muslims in Bosnia and Herzegovina”, even though ample evidence before them, the dissenting opinion of a judge on the panel, clearly shows this not to have been the case!

The ICTY Trial Chamber judges in both cases took it upon themselves, it seems, to take a gambit view of evidence they did not have. They maneuvered the non-existence for the court of discussion contents of meetings in Serbia organised by Stanisic to benefit Serbia and they took the non-existence of dead Croatian leaders testimony to maneuver it against Croatia!

The bias and the latitudes of inferences the ICTY Trial judges (except the dissenting ones) in both cases have given themselves are staggering and, to quote attorney Luka Misetic – grotesque.

This is really grotesque of the Hague tribunal. I was speechless that after 20 years the Hague tribunal arrived at this conclusion,” said Luka Misetic, who defended Croatian general Ante Gotovina before the UN court.

The madness emanating from the ICTY Trial Chamber, especially during the past couple of years, which can be taken as the years when politically motivated shaping of history of the war at the break up of former Yugoslavia has acquired and suffered from repeated panic attacks in pursuit of equating the aggressor with the victim, in pursuit of creating aggressors from those who defended themselves from aggression, ignoring to address aggression (such as employment of jihadist Mujahedins in Bosnia and herzegovina …, is so massive that it strikes one dumbfounded. And so, having that in mind, I cannot but agree with John Shattuck of the Boston Globe (War Crimes Whitewash)
The tribunal ruling eviscerated the doctrine of command responsibility, a central principle of international criminal law. This principle was first applied by the Nuremburg tribunal established after World War II to judge the responsibility of Nazi leaders for crimes committed by the Nazi regime. If the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia majority had been sitting at Nuremberg, few, if any, Nazi leaders would have been convicted”.

Engulfed by this madness, by this injustice, by the terrifying power many ICTY Trial Chamber judges have evidently given themselves in interpreting evidence to suit political agendas, one takes solace from the ICTY Appeal Chamber and its potential for truth worthy jurisprudence in these cases. That yet needs to come, but having in mind that the closure of ICTY is apparently imminent for 2014, with yet indefinite ways as to how the cases in progress will be dealt with thereafter, the fret for justice continues.   Ina Vukic, Prof. (Zgb); B.A., M.A.Ps. (Syd)


  1. Tomislav B says:

    From Facebook: Isti dvojac ( Stanišić i Simatović ) bili su aktivni i u agresiji na BiH. Preko njih su koordinirane agresorske akcije srpske JNA. O čemu taj Orie priča ?”

    • Translation of Tomislav B comment: The same duo (Stanisic and Simatovic) was also
      Active in aggression against Bosnia and Herzegovina. The actions of aggression by the Serbian Yugoslav Peoples’ Army were coordinated through the two men. What is that Orie talking about?

  2. Tomislav B says:

    From Facebook: “Sudac Alphons Orie vrlo vjerojatno više nije psihički i mentano sposoban donositi odluke o nečijoj krivici za ratni zločin. Ovaj izgledno izhlapljeli sudac svjesno pobija odluke Haaškog suda, i na svoju ruku pokušava promjeniti percepciju javnosti o presudama koje su na tribunalu već donesene. Brojni srpski zločinci i agresori na grad Vukovar su već osuđeni. Neki su i zbog sramotno niskih presuda ( Šljivančanin ) na slobodi. Cijeli svijet zna da su Srbi počinili jeziv zločin u Vukovaru. Niti jedna haaška presuda to ne može promjeniti. Šljivančanin se ponovo prijeti, a Oriea tom osuđenom zločincu daje vjetar u leđa. On svojim izjavama potiče ratnog zločinca Šljivančanina na ponovni zločin. Njegove izjave i sudske odluke se ne mogu drugačije tumačiti, nego tako. Pravo svakog čovjeka je braniti svoj i život svoje obitelji od brutalne agresije. Uslijed bombardiranja grada Vukovara i stanovnika u njemu,nisu birani ciljevi. Razarana su skloništa s civilima, bolnica s ranjenicima, zarobnjeni branitelji su mučeni i ubijani na najsvirepije načine. Cijeli grad je do temelja srušen, ubijane su trudnice, žene s djecom, starci i ranjenici. Organizirana su masovna silovanja u kojima su učestvovali svi četnički monstrumi. Sve te gadosti su u svojim nakaradnim glavama zamislili Veljko Kadijević, Stanišić i Simatović, a u djelo proveli Šljivančanin i brojni drugi po činu niže rangirani. Sve paravojne skupine od šešeljevih ” belih orlova” preko arkanovih zločinačkih bandi (tigrovi) do JNA egzekutora, bili su pod direktnom koordinacijom srpske zločinačke obavještajne službe. Dvojac Stanišić i Simatović,,, su po zapovjednoj odgovornosti u obavještajnoj službi tadašnje JNA bili zaduženi za planiranje masovnih egzekucija koje su se dogodile nakon pada grada. Ako je netko zapovjedno odgovoran za planiranje masovnih zločina, a činjenica je da su pomno isplanirani, tada se ne može dovoditi u pitanje odgovornost Stanišića i Simatovića. Njih dvojica su odgovorni za planiranje masovnih zločina.”

    • Translation of Tomislav B comment: Judge Alphons Orie most probably is no longer psychologically or mentally capable of bringing decisions about someone’s guilt for war crimes. This seemingly vapourised judge consciously denies the Hague court decisions and, on his own, attempts to change the public’s perceptions about the Tribunal’s decisions that have already been delivered. Numerous Serbian criminals and aggressors against the city of Vukovar have already been convicted. Some, on account of shamefully short prison sentences (Sljivcanin) are already free. The whole world knows that the Serbs committed gruesome crimes in Vukovar. Not a single Hague decision can change that. Sljivcanin is threatening again, and Orie is giving wind to that convicted criminal’s back. With his statements he stimulates the war criminal Sljivcanin to new crimes. His statements and decisions cannot be interpreted in any other way. It’s the right of every man to defend his and his family’s life from brutal aggression. Amidst the bombardment of Vukovar and its residents targets weren’t chosen. Civilian shelters were destroyed, the hospitals with patients, captured Croatian defenders were tortured and murdered in the cruelest of ways. The whole city was destroyed to the ground, pregnant women were killed, women with children, the elderly and the wounded. Mass rapes were organised in which all Chetnik monsters participated. All that repugnant nastiness was devised in Veljko Kadijevic’s, Stanisic’s and Simatovic’s unsightly heads, and Sljivcanin with others of lower military ranks executed it. All the paramilitary groups, from Seselj’s “white eagles” through Arkan’s criminal gangs (Tigers) to Yugoslav Army executors were under the direct coordination of the Serbian criminal intelligence service. Duo Stanisic and Simatovic were, under the command responsibility of the intelligence service of Yugoslav Army, in charge of planning of mass executions that occurred after the fall of the city. If some is responsible by command responsibility for the planning of mass crimes, and the fact is that these were carefully planned, then one cannot bring into question Stanisic’s and Simatovic’s responsibility. The two of them are responsible for the planning of mass crimes.

  3. This is very informative I never hear about this on the news or even on the net

  4. How come you didt need full report to write about this two and its funny how you never mention appeal.that may be done by prosecutors.

    • Amir Pilipovic, an appeal is an appeal and it is understood by almost everyone that both the defense and the prosecution may have grounds for appeal in any court case, and both sides have the right of reply to grounds of appeal of the other side; this is due process and well established in democracy.

  5. It is no coincidence that the two judges in the Stanisic/Simatovic acquittal are the same two who initially convicted Gotovina and Markac and had their so-called judgements overturned. Orie was a defence counsel for a Serb before became a judge and Gwaunza has profited from ethnic cleansing in her home country of Zimbabwe.

    • Yes, a great reminder mishkagora and an important point. Thanks on your comment

      • therealamericro says:

        It is “interesting” that all of the “journalists” and self-proclaimed “human rights activists” (who to a man and woman during the Croatian Spring were either opposed to the democratic Croatian Spring, or took part in the Communist primitives’ regime’s suppression of it) in Croatia who hysterically denounced the Gotovina and Markac acquittals on the prior show-trial charges and conviction, that defied elementary logic, reason, and the basic chronology of events and military science, premised on hearsay, conjecture and evidence the court itself ruled as invalid, have been deafeningly silent in regards to the Perisic, Simatovic and Stanisic acquitals despite all of the overwhelming evidence.


Leave a Reply

Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions:

All content on “Croatia, the War, and the Future” blog is for informational purposes only. “Croatia, the War, and the Future” blog is not responsible for and expressly disclaims all liability for the interpretations and subsequent reactions of visitors or commenters either to this site or its associate Twitter account, @IVukic or its Facebook account. Comments on this website are the sole responsibility of their writers and the writer will take full responsibility, liability, and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment. The nature of information provided on this website may be transitional and, therefore, accuracy, completeness, veracity, honesty, exactitude, factuality and politeness of comments are not guaranteed. This blog may contain hypertext links to other websites or webpages. “Croatia, the War, and the Future” does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness or completeness of information on any other website or webpage. We do not endorse or accept any responsibility for any views expressed or products or services offered on outside sites, or the organisations sponsoring those sites, or the safety of linking to those sites. Comment Policy: Everyone is welcome and encouraged to voice their opinion regardless of identity, politics, ideology, religion or agreement with the subject in posts or other commentators. Personal or other criticism is acceptable as long as it is justified by facts, arguments or discussions of key issues. Comments that include profanity, offensive language and insults will be moderated.