Croatia: “Chinese Whispers” fail – now let’s unveil the full truth of Serb aggression

Milorad Pupovac 1993 copy

Had the ICTY Appeal Chamber on 16 November 2012 not acquitted Croatian Generals Ante Gotovina and Mladen Markac of war crimes they were charged with in relation to August 1995, all the atrocities committed in Croatia prior to August 1995 would fade into forgetfulness and insignificance. The world would always refer to August 1995 as the most significant marker for Croatia’s Homeland War.

When in 2001 the ICTY Prosecutors prepared their initial indictments in relation to Croatian “Operation Storm” they focused their attention on ensuring that this military operation – which liberated Serb-occupied Croatian territory – stands as symbol which would equate the victim with the aggressor. Croatian army  was to be found to have been as brutal as the Serb aggressor. No doubt in my mind about that. The Prosecutors pranced around appearing to know everything there was to know about crimes supposedly perpetrated by Croatia’s war-leadership and army. Such atrocious turn of events would surely not have captured as an enormous media and other mileage throughout the world as it had, had the ICTY Prosecution not had “helping hands” from both Croatian and Serbian politicians, most of whom held high positions in the former communist Yugoslavia.

The “Chinese whispers” thus started and spread by ICTY Prosecution failed to cement the intended vilification and criminalisation of Croatia’s defense efforts in the face of Serb aggressor. Nevertheless, a great deal of damage to Croatia’s reputation has been done and misinformation circulates; it will take a long time to clear them. Perhaps the lies and misinformation will never be cleared given that the game of “Chinese whispers” has the capacity of creating myths that stick around for ages despite the fact that the game actually fails to reap the desired result.

That being the case it is now the time to pick up on the truth and deal with what really happened in Croatia before August 1995. A small but potent example of some of those happenings can be found in an article published in Hrvatski List on 27 December 2012, written by Ivica Marijacic.

The article claims that a long-time member of Croatian Parliament representing Serb minority, Milorad Pupovac, secretly supported the Serb armed rebellion against Croatia during 1990’s.

The leader of Serbian minority Milorad Pupovac used to go to his village Ceranje Donje near Benkovci, which the Chetniks held under control and expelled all Croatians from it during the war years. It’s not clear how he was able to do that but it’s assumed that he had help from members of UNPROFOR forces who were there and kept the line of separation (A photograph, reportedly taken in 1993, has been discovered that evidences his visits to his village during the war)… Pupovac supported, or had nothing against, armed rebellion of the local Serbs against the Republic of Croatia in which his two brothers actively participated. Serbs were the ethnic majority in the village of Ceranje Donje but some Croatian families also lived there; their houses were and still are next door to Milorad Pupovac family home.  The Croatian families suffered abuse by the local Serbs and Milorad Pupovac’s family did not lift a finger to protect them…

Indeed, the article in Hrvatski List goes on to say that Milorad Pupovac’s brothers Vojislav and Mladen were very active as members of the armed Serb rebel forces. Mladen was reportedly the extreme one and served as First Class Corporal under the notorious Captain Dragan (Dragan Vasiljkovic a.k.a. Daniel Snedden). While Milorad Pupovac cannot be held responsible for his brothers’ actions he did nothing to stop the abuse and expulsions of Croatians from his village nor did he stop the destruction through bombings of their homes. The article goes on to say that witnesses have stated that Milorad Pupovac did encourage Serb rebels not to give up their armed rebellion.

A question, or two, must be asked: How can such a deeply compromised person serve in any Parliament? What chance of proper reconciliation between Serbs and Croatians can there be when such a deeply compromised person serves in Croatian Parliament?

This article sent shivers down my spine. I remembered helping as a Croatian speaking Psychologist the Australian ABC TV crew film the documentary “A Coward’s War” (1995) which interviewed the utterly traumatised and abused survivors of genocidal Serb brutality in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. The issue that stuck to my mind like superglue was the fact that most of the survivors were brutalised, tortured, sent to Serb concentration camps (initially in 1991 into concentration camps within Serbia, e.g. Begejci) by their neighbours/Serb civilians (who had armed themselves later). It is these and similar bestialities which occurred between 1991 and August 1995 that should take a prominent place in the documenting of history of that war, not Operation Storm. Ina Vukic, Prof. (Zgb); B.A., M.A.Ps. (Syd)

Finally – accused Serb war criminal Captain Dragan to be extradited to Croatia

1991 in Croatia as rebel Serbs and Serbia led crumbling
Yugoslav Peoples’ Army plundered, murdered, raped and
ethnically cleansed of Croatians and non-Serbs
one third of Croatia’s territory Captain Dragan (Right) and
Vojislav Seselj (Left, currently on ICTY trial for war crimes)
pose for photographers.

Australian Home Affairs Minister Jason Clare’s decision to give the final “go-ahead” for the extradition of Dragan Vasiljkovic (Captain Dragan, a.k.a. Daniel Snedden) could not have come at a better time. It almost coincided with ICTY’s Appeal Chamber’s acquittal of Croatian Generals Ante Gotovina and Mladen Markac.

Serbia has responded to the ICTY acquittal with its usual mumbo-jumbo, threatening, in protest to scale down its cooperation with the ICTY to a technical level!

As if it has been doing anything else in the past two decades!

It colluded and collaborated with ICTY prosecutors at all times in ferocious attempts to make the equating of the victim with the aggressor stick! It hid from the ICTY Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic for years. It collaborated with ICTY prosecutors in the construction of trumped up charges against the Croatian Generals of joint criminal enterprise and alleged deportation of Serbs from Croatia. It continued to reject the release of documents that prove without a shadow of a doubt that Croatian Serbs were not deported from Croatia in 1995 by Croatia but were ordered to evacuate Croatia by the Serb leadership.  It now has the hide to call the ICTY Appeal Chamber as unjust and politically driven!

It is for such reasons that the decision to set in motion the extradition of Captain Dragan to Croatia is important at this time. The just decision by the ICTY Appeal Chamber attracts currently comments that attempt to divert the attention from justice for the Generals and Croatian defense against aggression. Captain Dragan’s extradition serves as a stark reminder of how organised and terrible the onslaught against Croatia was.

Instead of seeing some light at the end of the dark tunnel of Serbia’s denials about its active role in aggression against Croatia, the world still needs reminders that Serbs were the aggressors – very organised ones, at that.

The majority decision of the ICTY Appeal Chamber November 16 to acquit the Croatian Generals of war crimes is one of the most momentous reversals of Trial Chamber judgments in the court’s 18-year history. The significance of this reversal is manifold but the most important one is in the fact that individuals (the Generals) who were on trial have been vindicated. They are not war criminals. They are the former soldiers of the Croatian Army that defended the freedom and the right to self -determination of Croatian people when they, in 94% majority, voted to secede from Communist Yugoslavia.

Furthermore, the ICTY Appeal Chamber ruling overturned the April 2011 Trial Chamber verdict that had dealt a horrible blow to the image of Croatia, which painted Croatia as a perpetrator in a joint criminal enterprise, and not the victim of atrocities as it truly was.

Journalist Lanai Vasek wrote in the Australian newspaper, November 17, the following regarding Captain Dragan’s extradition to Croatia:

Home Affairs Minister Jason Clare’s decision to green-light his removal to Croatia comes two years after the High Court paved the way for Mr Dragan Vasiljkovic – also known as Daniel Snedden and Captain Dragan – to be extradited.

‘The minister arrived at his determination following careful consideration of the provisions of the Extradition Act and taking into account representations made by, and on behalf of, Mr Vasiljkovic as to why he should not be surrendered,’ a spokesman for the Home Affairs Minister said last night.

‘It is open to Mr Vasiljkovic to seek review of the minister’s surrender determination.’

The government’s decision does not end the legal saga as Mr Vasiljkovic is still able to appeal against the ruling to the Federal and High Courts.

It emerged last night that Dan Mori, the lawyer who represented confessed terrorism supporter David Hicks in the US, was working with Mr Vasiljkovic, a Belgrade-born Australian citizen, in preparation to launch an appeal.

No Australian government has ever successfully extradited an accused war criminal.

Mr Vasiljkovic is wanted for questioning by Croatia on war crimes allegedly committed during the Balkans conflict, including murder and genocide.

This year the High Court ruled against the extradition of Charles Zentai, accused of murdering a Jewish teenager during World War II.

In 2009 former home affairs minister Brendan O’Connor ordered the extradition to Hungary of Zentai, but the 90-year-old Perth man fought the ruling in the courts and in August won a High Court appeal.

Mr Vasiljkovic’s solicitor Bruce Dennis said last night his client had been speaking to Mr Mori ‘directly all day’.

‘If Mr Mori decides to take on the case, Shine Lawyers will be acting but I will be assisting,’ Mr Dennis said. It is understood the Queensland-based law firm has taken on the case, but Mr Mori declined to comment last night.

Mr Dennis said Mr Vasiljkovic had been informed yesterday morning at Sydney’s Silverwater prison of Mr Clare’s ruling and was “just devastated”.

Mr Dennis received notification of Mr Clare’s decision in a letter from the Attorney-General’s Department at 5.30pm on Thursday.

‘The one thing he was hoping was, because there had been such a long delay since the High Court case, that the Attorney-General was in some way seeking a couple of protections for him before he would be sent anywhere,” Mr Dennis said’.

He said those protections included the time Mr Vasiljkovic had served in Silverwater being recognised, and the assurance of an independent trial.

‘Because he is someone who is a hero in Serbia but a villain across the border in Croatia, it’s very difficult for him to get a fair trial,’ the lawyer said. ‘No such assurances have been given.’

In 2010, after the High Court ruled Mr Vasiljkovic could be extradited to Croatia, the accused war criminal fled federal police and spent 43 days on the run.

The Australian found Mr Vasiljkovic hiding out on a dry-docked yacht near Yamba in northern NSW during his time on the run and he had talked of ‘sailing north’.

In 2009, The Australian successfully defended a defamation action in the NSW Supreme Court brought by Mr Vasiljkovic under the name Daniel Snedden.

In doing so, Nationwide News, publisher of this newspaper, ran a de facto war crimes hearing in which it proved, on the balance of probabilities, the substantive truth of that article. The NSW Supreme Court found Mr Vasiljkovic had committed the war crimes of torture and rape, and had admitted to a massacre.

The court found Nationwide News had proven a raft of allegations made against him, including that he repeatedly raped a woman in Zvornik in 1992; that he had admitted committing a massacre in 1991 to a journalist from London’s The Times; and that he had personally committed the war crime of torture as well as condoning such crimes by troops under his command.

Mr Vasiljkovic emigrated to Australia as a 14-year-old and served in the Australian Army Reserve. He returned to the former Yugoslavia in the early 1990s to take control of a Serbian paramilitary unit during the Balkans war. He has consistently maintained he did not commit any of the alleged offences”.

It’s alleged Vasiljkovic killed Croatian citizens and ordered others to commit murder when he was a Serb paramilitary commander with the self-proclaimed Serb Republic of Krajina (1991 to 1995).

Captain Dragan wants a fair trial! The problem is that fair to him may easily mean that his role in Serb aggression against Croatia be erased without a trial! It fits into the same frame of mind that leads Serbia in denial. Such denial has a number of functions and one of these fits into the Serb grip on Serbian Republic entity within Bosnia and Herzegovina, which was established through genocide and ethnic cleansing. Thank God Croatia’s Operation Storm delivered Croatian Krajina territory from a similar final destination.  Ina Vukic, Prof. (Zgb); B.A., M.A.Ps.(Syd)

Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions:

All content on “Croatia, the War, and the Future” blog is for informational purposes only. “Croatia, the War, and the Future” blog is not responsible for and expressly disclaims all liability for the interpretations and subsequent reactions of visitors or commenters either to this site or its associate Twitter account, @IVukic or its Facebook account. Comments on this website are the sole responsibility of their writers and the writer will take full responsibility, liability, and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment. The nature of information provided on this website may be transitional and, therefore, accuracy, completeness, veracity, honesty, exactitude, factuality and politeness of comments are not guaranteed. This blog may contain hypertext links to other websites or webpages. “Croatia, the War, and the Future” does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness or completeness of information on any other website or webpage. We do not endorse or accept any responsibility for any views expressed or products or services offered on outside sites, or the organisations sponsoring those sites, or the safety of linking to those sites. Comment Policy: Everyone is welcome and encouraged to voice their opinion regardless of identity, politics, ideology, religion or agreement with the subject in posts or other commentators. Personal or other criticism is acceptable as long as it is justified by facts, arguments or discussions of key issues. Comments that include profanity, offensive language and insults will be moderated.