Neven Sesardic claims the Hague Is Wrong – Beyond Any Reasonable Doubt

Left: General Ante Gotovina - Right: General Mladen Markac - at the Hague, September 2011

The Croatian Jutarnji List published an article by Neven Sesardic  “The Hague is Wrong – Beyond any reasonable doubt” in the newspaper’s 24-26 December issue.

Sesardic examines the ICTY April 2011 judgment on Croatian General’s Ante Gotovina and Mladen Markac with no stones unturned when it comes to the ICTY’s conviction regarding the so-called “joint criminal enterprise” – i.e. alleged mass expulsion of Serbs from Croatia in 1995.

He points out with compelling arguments, refering to points of evidence, how the ICTY in the Hague was wrong in its judgment (currently on Appeal). It’s a “must read” and, hence, the author’s text is translated into English.

While most of the article is taken up in demonstrating why the Hague was wrong beyond any reasonable doubt in its April 2011 verdict, Sesardic concludes his article with a painful truth:

Double Standards

          …   Here is how Churchill openly advocated such a mass expulsion of Germans from areas in which they had been living for centuries: “Expulsion is a method which, insofar as we have been able to see, will be the most satisfactory and lasting. There will be no mixture of populations to cause endless trouble. A clean sweep will be made. I am not alarmed by these transferences, which are more possible in modern conditions.”
(Churchill’s speech in the British Parliament in 1944)

And indeed, things went according to plan and soon the “clean sweep” was made. According to unbiased sources, somewhere between 12 and 14 million Germans were forced to leave forever their homes in a movement that a historian of that period called “probably the largest forced migration in modern history.” At least half a million people lost their lives in the process.

No one was ever held accountable for those crimes and no politician (except
Vaclav Havel) has ever expressed regret on behalf of his country for these crimes of mass ethnic cleansing in which a number of politicians were demonstrably involved.

On the other hand we have The Hague Tribunal, which attributed to the Croatian political leadership and the Croatian army the responsibility for the same kind of crime even though this charge is in fact nothing but an unproved and arbitrary accusation”.

Neven Sesardic, (born 1949, Belgrade) is a leading Croatian Philosopher, Academic, author of numerous articles in leading Philosophy Journals, author of books, writer of many newspaper articles. His work has taken him to all sides of the world. Currently he is a Professor of Philosophy, Lingnan University, Hong Kong. His previous academic and research posts are: Associate Professor of Philosophy, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, Research Fellow, Department of Philosophy, King’s College London, Professor of Philosophy, Miyazaki International College, Japan, NSF Research Fellow and Fellow of the Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Minnesota, Visiting Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Notre Dame, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, University of Zagreb, Fellow of the Center for Interdisciplinary Research, University of Bielefeld, Fellow of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, University of Giessen, Assistant Professor, University of Zagreb, Lecturer, University of Zagreb, Croatia.

Neven Sesardic

Related posts:

https://inavukic.com/2011/10/19/lest-we-forget/

https://inavukic.com/2011/10/30/the-trial-of-generals-ante-gotovina-and-mladen-markac-a-farce-from-beginning-to-end/

https://inavukic.com/2011/11/14/this-could-happen-anywhere-vukovar-skabrnje/

https://inavukic.com/2011/11/20/general-ante-gotovina-and-calvary-at-icty-in-the-hague/

https://inavukic.com/2011/12/20/icty-in-the-hague-just-before-christmas-2011-goran-hadzic-trial-date-set-general-ante-gotovina-appeal-road-strewn-with-more-unjust-obstacles/

https://inavukic.com/2011/12/26/amnesty-international-is-discrimination-against-some-victims-apparent/

Comments

  1. Yo. I clearly needed to actually make a good quick remark and also let you learn that in fact I’ve been focusing on your personal wordpress blog for quite some time. Keep up the tremendous task and I will be looking again again once again.

    Like

Trackbacks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions:

All content on “Croatia, the War, and the Future” blog is for informational purposes only. “Croatia, the War, and the Future” blog is not responsible for and expressly disclaims all liability for the interpretations and subsequent reactions of visitors or commenters either to this site or its associate Twitter account, @IVukic or its Facebook account. Comments on this website are the sole responsibility of their writers and the writer will take full responsibility, liability, and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment. The nature of information provided on this website may be transitional and, therefore, accuracy, completeness, veracity, honesty, exactitude, factuality and politeness of comments are not guaranteed. This blog may contain hypertext links to other websites or webpages. “Croatia, the War, and the Future” does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness or completeness of information on any other website or webpage. We do not endorse or accept any responsibility for any views expressed or products or services offered on outside sites, or the organisations sponsoring those sites, or the safety of linking to those sites. Comment Policy: Everyone is welcome and encouraged to voice their opinion regardless of identity, politics, ideology, religion or agreement with the subject in posts or other commentators. Personal or other criticism is acceptable as long as it is justified by facts, arguments or discussions of key issues. Comments that include profanity, offensive language and insults will be moderated.
%d bloggers like this: