International criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia: Radovan Karadzic acquitted mid-trial of one charge of genocide – the shock that shudders the very backbone of humanity

Serb concentration camp Keraterm near Prijedor 1992

ICTY, Hague, 28 June, acquitted – mid-trial! – former Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic of one charge of genocide but upheld 10 other war crimes counts related to atrocities in Bosnia’s bloody war. Although Karadzic sought by way of motion to court to be acquitted of all 11 charges of war crimes, he succeeded in only one and Srebrenica (1995/ more than 8,000 Muslim men and boys murdered) genocide was retained under count of genocide to be tried.

The angering acquittal occurred “mid-trial” – i.e. after the prosecution completed presenting its case and evidence the Trial Chamber ruled that there was not enough evidence to show that killings and expulsions of Croatians and Bosniacs (Muslims) carried out by Bosnian Serb forces in several municipalities of Bosnia and Herzegovina between March and December 1992 were committed with genocidal intent.

This decision has shocked and angered survivors in Bosnia and Herzegovina; it shocks and angers the whole just world.

The charge dismissed covered mass killings, expulsions and persecution by Serb forces. Presiding Judge Oh-Gon Kwon said prosecutors did not provide enough evidence to “be capable of supporting a conviction of genocide in the (Bosnian) municipalities.”

The judges said there was enough evidence to uphold charges including murder and persecution in the early stages of the war, but the killings did not rise to the level of genocide, which requires prosecutors to prove intent to wipe out a specific group in whole or part.

It’s expected that the ICTY prosecution will appeal this decision and if they do not it’ll be clearer than now that such “shonky” work by the Prosecutor in preparing for the war crimes charges against Karadzic was done on purpose – to place Karadzic at an advantage in the eyes of the world; to dilute the perception of the depth of his evil deeds against humanity.

The odd thing to me, also, is the fact that the judges did not direct the prosecution to change the charge from genocide to mass murder once they acquitted Karadzic of that specific genocide charge. Under the rules of the UN tribunal, defendants can seek acquittal after prosecutors finish presenting their case. Hence, given that Karadzic has not yet presented his defence for any of the charges there is time for the Prosecutor to change the charge in case an appeal of the acquittal of genocide charge would not be upheld. Karadzic is expected to start arguing his case on October 16.

Commenting on the above acquittal Ejup Ganic (President of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina 1997-1999 and 2000 – 2001) said on Friday 29 June:

Is it genocide when in Visegrad they gather citizens from surrounding villages and suburbs, loot them, rape some, then force them into a house and set fire to all. Set fire to all, from two-year-old children to the elderly of 80. What’s missing there for it to be genocide?”  

“Politics were crucial. So why is genocide not the verdict? For two reasons:

Firstly, because it would indirectly involve Serbia.

Secondly, the international community would be involved more directly.

Because it lasted. It wasn’t slaughter that lasted three or four days, like in Srebrenica. Genocide was committed under the supervision of Radovan Karadzic. But, Yugoslav Peoples Army participated under the leadership of Slobodan Milosevic. It was orderd from Belgrade… Again, I repeat, the genocide in the seven municipalities (Bratunac, Foča, Ključ, Prijedor, Sanski Most, Vlasenica and Zvornik) was acquitted because otherwise it would touch Serbia more directly than Srebrenica does. Karadzic managed the committing of the crimes but Serbia ensured all needed infrastructure for the crimes to occur,” said Ganic.

The months of Serb terror, murderous sprees that to my mind had genocidal intents – once one exterminates children and sets out to exterminate children of an ethnic group, then genocide is the only word that can, humanly and legally, define such mass murders. That is what Serbs did in those seven municipalities of Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1992.

There is no doubt in my mind about that. I recall those days of 1992 very vividly, with overwhelming distress to this day. Both Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina were under systematic genocidal plunder by the Serbs. I was head of a community radio program in the Croatian language in Sydney, Australia at the time – I worked that radio program on a voluntary basis but there was nothing voluntary about the news reports and bulletins I received via faxes daily from the war zones. The toll paid by the Croatians and Bosniacs at the hands of Serbian aggressor was a horror worst than a single word, “genocide” could ever describe.

It is as clear as day: this shameful exercise by the ICTY in acquitting this count of genocide has nothing to do with justice but everything to do with politically saving Slobodan Milosevic’s Serbia and the involved international community.

Not only that – it would also shake up the very foundations of the Serbian Republic created with the blood of Croatians and Bosniacs. All of the seven municipalities (except Kljuc and Sanski Most) had become parts of the Serbian Republic in Bosnia – the entity created on genocide and ethnic cleansing for the benefit of a Greater Serbia.

To me, everything points to a reality where ICTY is set on minimizing the horrendous and genocidal, planned, aggression against Croatians and Bosniacs so that the need for these people to defend their very existence at the time could also be reduced in the eyes of the world. What a horrible way to deal with justice in 21st Century. Should the ICTY or the Prosecutor fail in substituting the charge of genocide (since it has acquitted it for lack of standard evidence) for systematic mass murder then this too will confirm that in delivering justice, justice takes a second place to political maneuvering. Ina Vukic, Prof. (Zgb); B.A., M.A.Ps. (Syd)

Comments

  1. Reblogged this on Eyes of the Mind.

    Like

  2. Mark Wright says:

    Oh Lord, that is absolutely unbelievable, horrible! Why on earth would a court of justice acquit a charge of genocide and at least not replace it with mass murder and persecution? Beyond tolerance. The whole world knows that Serbs went on a murderous rampage in Croatia and Bosnia in 1991, 1992 – we all saw it on TV in newspapers, heard on the radio. The Hague judges should hide in shame – but, no, let’s get the UN to boot them out, after all the UN gets our taxpaying dollars & any currency you can think of.
    I can understand where the court is coming from when it comes to rules BUT, Jesus, the evidence is there – murder, murder, rape, rape, expulsion, expulsion…
    Just unthinkable!

    Like

  3. Miso Sorbel says:

    Prijedor – just one of the seven municipalities where Karadzic participated/ordered genocide. And this is not enough for ICTY to say it was genocide! God help humanity!


    Like

  4. We NEVER should have been involved with the ICTY…it is a political construct of the immoral EU that set not to reconcile and bring about justice of the warring sides, but to cleanse and justify it’s own motives, accomplice and moral failures in a war that should never had happened. But our honourable Generals will pay a heavy price for moral and justified self defense; the ICTY will acquit a genocidal murderer who pre-planned and even publicly broadcast how he was going to exterminate and make disappear Bosniacs and Croats, yet our Generals Gotovina and Markac played by the rules, targeted only military targets, and provided safe passage for Serbs who did not want to live in Croatia. Scandalous, immoral, outrageous…words can’t describe the feelings. Worst, no one in the world really cares and if they did the economic crisis ensures their silence. Croatia wake up, be strong…stop belittling yourself…I alway hear from Croats that we are a small nation, what can we do? Bull$hit! We can take care of our own. We can be strong, independent and free. I am convinced that there would be no ethnic problems in Croatia if our population was 2-3 times larger…it’s a numbers game…absentee landlords risk much.

    Like

    • True regarding numbers but even one person should be big. Croatian government has failed miserably by not speaking up, over and over again, to the world.

      Like

  5. True, numbers don’t determine justice or morality. So, we may be in the right, but practically we lose. In the end it’s a bout power and power does come from morality, but that power needs numbers. Think about Gandi…a powerful man through his morality and humility, but if he were only one man nothing would have been achieved…he was more than one solitude, he represented 100s of millions of Indians. Without the force of numbers, there are minimal or no consequences…how would have the British acted against Gandi if he were not representing 100s of millions of Indians versus just a handful of 4-5 million people?

    Like

    • Agree on lumbers matter. My thoughts go along with “noise” one makes and the more noise the wider the audience. At the end of the day it’s the individual person (e.g. Gotovina, Markac) that bear the true burden. Given that these individuals acted for the greater good – defend Croatia and her people – then the government has a duty to speak out, release press releases etc in defence and keep telling the world how it really was, over and over again.

      Like

  6. Yes, agreed…the message need to be loud, clear and frequent.

    Like

Trackbacks

  1. […] Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) decided,  28 June 2012, mid-trial, to acquit Radovan Karadzic of the genocide charge that covered “Brisevo-style” massacre in those municipalities (including […]

    Like

  2. […] posts: Carnage in Brisevo & Acquitting Radovan Karadzic of one charge of genocide Share this:TwitterStumbleUponFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. Filed Under: […]

    Like

  3. […] discussed by Ina Vukic at the time, the acquittal was unfathomable: “once one exterminates children and sets out to […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Disclaimer, Terms and Conditions:

All content on “Croatia, the War, and the Future” blog is for informational purposes only. “Croatia, the War, and the Future” blog is not responsible for and expressly disclaims all liability for the interpretations and subsequent reactions of visitors or commenters either to this site or its associate Twitter account, @IVukic or its Facebook account. Comments on this website are the sole responsibility of their writers and the writer will take full responsibility, liability, and blame for any libel or litigation that results from something written in or as a direct result of something written in a comment. The nature of information provided on this website may be transitional and, therefore, accuracy, completeness, veracity, honesty, exactitude, factuality and politeness of comments are not guaranteed. This blog may contain hypertext links to other websites or webpages. “Croatia, the War, and the Future” does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness or completeness of information on any other website or webpage. We do not endorse or accept any responsibility for any views expressed or products or services offered on outside sites, or the organisations sponsoring those sites, or the safety of linking to those sites. Comment Policy: Everyone is welcome and encouraged to voice their opinion regardless of identity, politics, ideology, religion or agreement with the subject in posts or other commentators. Personal or other criticism is acceptable as long as it is justified by facts, arguments or discussions of key issues. Comments that include profanity, offensive language and insults will be moderated.
%d bloggers like this: